What do you think most sane candidates would do if they were indicted for election fraud?If you answered, think about what is in the best interest of his or her defense. Your name isn't Mark Tate.
No, Mark's campaign first attacked the prosecution as politically motivated.
Let's keep in mind that Matt Britton, the special prosecutor, was appointed by a judge to determine whether to bring the charges.
Then Mark blamed his opponent Jill Holtzman Vogel.
"In an interview on Monday, Tate acknowledged that he had spoken to investigators and suggested that Vogel instigated it."
Tate's minion Kay Gunter falsely attacked the brave citizen who brought the charges to the attention of the state board of elections and Commonwealth's attorney.
Finally and most importantly, Mark is attacking the American justice system. He seems to believe that he is above the law, and anyone who has the audacity to investigate whether he is breaking the law should be the real criminal.
Jill Holtzman Vogel summed up Tate's actions fairly well in the Fauquier Times-Democrat on Tuesday:
"Mark Tate will have a fair trial, and he deserves his day in court," a May 24 written statement from Holtzman Vogel said. "Mark's attacks on me are actually on the ethics and reputation of a special prosecutor, two judges and a grand jury, all of whom have no connection to politics or to my campaign."
